PROOF THE WII HAS BETTER GRAPHICS THAN THE 360 and PS3?

I TOLD YOU THE WII HAD AWESOME GRAPHICS MUCH BETTER THAN THE FAILBOX 360 AND THE PS GAY



http://wiimedia.ign.com/wii/image/article/881/881019/the-conduit-20080611021227476_640w.jpg



http://www.wiihotties.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/conduit-490-pic.jpg



AND I CANT WAIT TILL WE GET RES EVIL ON THE SYSTEM, WILL PWN THE SHITTY 360 AND PS3 WIT THE LAME *** CONTROLLER!PROOF THE WII HAS BETTER GRAPHICS THAN THE 360 and PS3?
the games you show need a hell of alot of anti aliasing lol. If wii had better graphics, no one would play it because it owuldnt be cartoony anymore
This is not a question. This topic should be removed. First of all the 360 and PS3 have better games than the Wii. Second, Wii has shitty graphics on most of the games. Also these pictures seem fake that the people must have taken them from another game system and if they are real what are the names of the games so that we can check if it is realPROOF THE WII HAS BETTER GRAPHICS THAN THE 360 and PS3?
THIS ISN'T A QUESTION DUDE ITS JUST YOU GETTING MAD THAT YOU DONT HAVE A 360 OR PS3 THE ONLY REASON Y WII IS SO POPULAR IS BECAUSE ITS NINTENDO THE BIGGEST GAME SYSTEM MAKER IN THE WORLD. AND THIS REALLY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR IGNORENCE, THE WII HAS HORRID GRAPHICS ON GAMES LIKE FALLOUT 3 AND FARCRY BUT ON GAMES LIKE WII SPORTS THAT HAS THE ONLY GREAT GRAPHICS AND FRAME RATE.360 PROBABLY HAS THE BEST BECCAUSE OF THE COMPANY WHO MADE IT. SONY IS SECONDIN GRAPHICS THEN ITS MAYBE THE XBOX AND THEN PS2 THEN THE WII
/* the wii and ps3 bow down to the 360 :) *\PROOF THE WII HAS BETTER GRAPHICS THAN THE 360 and PS3?
I was intrigued when I saw your question and the word "PROOF" in it. But then I read the entire thing, clicked on your links, and once again, was sadly let down by the images displayed. I think you should re-word your question to state, FAILED PROOF the Wii has better graphics. It's obvious that you have been brainwashed to believe these two images were captured from the Wii in raw format but as you can easily see by viewing multiple images, these two were obviously "fixed up" and "tweaked" to mislead the viewer into thinking he/she is actually looking at a true, raw, screencapture from a game played on the Wii.



Although some seem to think it's a matter of opinion that the next gen consoles from Sony and MS have better graphics and visual presentation, the fact of the matter is that there is no comparison between the graphics hardware in a Wii and that in a 360 or PS3.



To help illustrate the differences, I'm including two hyperlinks below which outline the shortcomings of the graphics hardware in the Wii, and the power of that found in the 360.



Wii Graphics Chip: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wii#Technic鈥?/a>

360 Graphics Chip: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenos_(grap鈥?/a>



As you can see, the ATI "Hollywood" GPU found in the Wii sports only 24MB of dedicated graphics memory and 64MB external, whereas the 360 comes with 10MB of EDRAM as well as another 512 available from the main pool. The specs for the Xenos graphics chip far outshine those of the "Hollywood" chip so as you can obviously see, the images you posted are in no way a true and factual representation of the graphics capability of the Wii console.



Sorry, but being the fan of Answers that I am, I just had to call you out. It's not fair to mislead the Answers community as you have attempted. And once again, the truth shall overcome!



Peace!

The Reverend